Lumix GH3 Audio vs Zoom H6

Thursday, January 23rd, 2014

I’ve been using my Panasonic Lumix GH3 as my main video cam for the last year or so and it’s a terrific tool. The articulated display, live HDMI out, high bitrate codecs, WIFI connectivity, and luscious image quality have made it my favorite shooter. But I’ve avoided using camera audio even though the GH3 does have some intriguing audio features. There’s a mic input backed up with a 19 step Mic Level adjustment in the video menu, as well as a rough level meter and a headphone jack for monitoring. But in my initial tests I thought the audio recorded in the camera was not up to par, so I continued with my usual procedure of recording audio on a separate dedicated recorder.

Some internet posters, though, reported that they were using the GH3 mic input and getting good results. They recommended setting the GH3 Mic Level adjustment to 1 then providing a fairly strong, but still mic level, signal. I was persuaded to do some more testing and just in the nick of time Zoom released a firmware update for the H6 that adds the ability to adjust the level of the line out signal. The line out level is -10 dBu, or consumer level. The new firmware gives the ability to attenuate the output in 5 dB steps down to -30 dB.

With a little experimenting I found that a setting of -25 dB on the Zoom line level adjustment along with a setting of 1 on the GH3 Mic Level gave me clean audio in the GH3 without clipping or activating a limiter in the camera. Even better, the recording in the camera was very close in level to the recording captured in the Zoom H6, so I could use this setup and simply aim for a good reading on the Zoom H6 meters while being confident that the GH3 was getting the right input level.

I created a video with a bit of narration and some slack key guitar, with a couple of sections repeated with the audio from the GH3 followed by the same audio from the Zoom H6. I used the 50 Mbps MOV format with PCM audio, presumably the best the camera can produce.

But of course YouTube is not the ideal source for audio comparisons, so I’ve created clips for you to download and compare in a more controlled way. This is the same audio that was used in the video above, and it has received the same treatment, which consisted only of adjusting the level based on a test tone recorded to both sources. I compared the test tones from the two sources and found the Zoom H6 to be 1.37 dB lower in level than the GH3 track. So I used the adjustment feature in the Sonalksis FreeG plugin to add that 1.37 dB to the Zoom track. Small level differences like this can really throw off a comparison of clips that are otherwise the same, so I nearly always take some steps to match levels in these tests.

These files are uncompress 44.1/16 WAV files, so they will not stream well. Ideally you should download them and use an ABX comparator so you can listen to the clips in a double blind comparison.

Narration-GH3
Narration-H6
Music-GH3
Music-H6

When I listen to these clips, especially the quiet sections at the end of each clip, I hear a bit more noise from the GH3 recordings. With that said, the audio seems to me to be better than other video cameras I’ve used, and I expect to use the mic input on my GH3 for some future projects. Hopefully this comparison will help you decide if it will work for you.



This entry was posted on Thursday, January 23rd, 2014 at 4:57 pm and is filed under Audio, Comparisons, Video. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


One Response to ' Lumix GH3 Audio vs Zoom H6 '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' Lumix GH3 Audio vs Zoom H6 '.

  1. Bob Penzien said in post # 1,

    on February 12th, 2014 at 9:38 am

    Hi Fran,
    Great article! I am brand new to photography and videography. I just bought the Panasonic GH3 with a 12-35 mm f/2.8 zoom lens. I am considering buying a Zoom H6 too. I am a real estate broker that would like to produce high quality HD video for my real estate business using YouTube. High quality audio for my video work is important too. What video format do you recommend … MOV, AVCHD or MP4? Do you recommend 1920 X 1080, 30p? Also, do you have a favorite video editing program that you recommend for Windows? Thanks in advance!
    Bob Penzien
    Martinez, CA

Leave a reply






About the Blog

    Howdy, my name is Fran Guidry and this is my Homebrewed Music blog.

    I play Hawaiian slack key guitar and recorded my solo acoustic CD at home. Most of the recording information I find on the internet seems focused on bands, drums, multitracking, and so on but my main focus is recording solo acoustic guitar. Lately I’ve been enjoying video recording along with audio, so that shows up in the blog as well.

    I’m also a guitar nut. I love big ones and little ones, handmades and factory guitars, cheap ones and expensive ones. So I’ll be sharing the fun of exploring guitars as well, along with the challenges of amplifying acoustic guitars for live performance.

    Welcome!

Philosophy

    My recording philosophy is pragmatic, skeptical, not super critical. After all, the performance is by far the most important component of a track, and every aspect of any recording is a matter of taste.

    But I do like to know “about stuff.” Back in hifi days I learned about double blind testing. I learned that we humans can easily hear differences that don’t really exist. The more I’ve learned about our human auditory system, the more I’m skeptical of what people say they hear, especially if they claim that a particular microphone or preamp or cable has some magical property.

    I’ve only been recording since 2001, and when I started I found the usual places on the internet. I sought advice and accepted it, thought I would improve my recordings by using more expensive equipment. It didn’t work.

    Two things that did seem to lead to better recordings were experience and room treatment. Getting an appealing sound is the combination of many small details, and learning those details only comes from experience. Amd the sound of the recording space is obviously a big factor.

    I’ve only recorded seriously using digital technology, but I remember trying to record rehearsals and gigs back in analog days. I don’t have any nostalgia for analog recording and playback systems at all. I think even low end digital systems can capture marvelous recordings. So when I look at gear, I look for good specs: low noise, broad flat frequency response, wide dynamic range, low distortion. I’m not interested in colorful components, mics and preamps with a sound, I want the sound to be the sound of my guitar.

    But the last word is that I’m just learning and I hope you find something useful in my posts.