Zoom Q3HD vs. iPhone 4

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

Video is going through some wonderful transitions these days, and the addition of 720p HD to the iPhone got me to sign on the dotted line with AT&T. Honestly, I rarely use the feature, but it seemed like a natural comparison to the Q3HD – after all, if the iPhone does the same job, or close to it, the Q becomes a lot less attractive.

Hold the Phone

I learned a few things in the process of getting some comparison clips. First, I figured out how to use some of the mic stand parts I’ve collected as an iPhone “tripod.”

iPhone Tripod Improvised from Mic Stand Parts

iPhone Tripod Improvised from Mic Stand Parts

The soft rubber mic clips don’t really fit any of my mics, but they’re handy for holding onto odd objects.

Then I learned that the iPhone viewfinder is not very video friendly. The right edge of the actual frame is hidden under the toolbar, so I was stuck guessing and experimenting to find the right position for my shot. And the size of the framing is off, the actual image is cropped noticeably larger than the view on the LCD, that is, if the viewfinder shows the image within some boundaries, the actual image will spill over those boundaries, and the object of interest will be smaller than expected. Once again, it was a matter of experimenting, guessing, griping, and doing it again to find the right distance to get the framing I wanted. (I’m hoping some iPhone guru will read this and call me names while explaining what I’m doing wrong!)

Here are the two clips on YouTube.

You can also download clips as delivered by the cameras: iPhone 4 Video Zoom Q3HD Video

Built-in Editing

Both cams have built-in video editing. The Q provides only bare bones functions, trim or divide. Trim lops off the beginning up to the selected point. Divide splits one clip into two at the selected point. But this is enough to pull one good performance out of a bunch of retakes, and clean up the beginning and end. It’s really all you need. The interface is a little tweaky, but I figured it out without reading the manual. The iPhone has a lot more power in the form of iMovie, an inexpensive app. It offers titling, more complex editing, inserting additional media, audio substitution. And the interface feels slicker. But I had to go online to read the FAQ to figure out how to use the thing, I didn’t need themes or titles or additional media or audio substitution, and the program appeared to transcode the video in the process of creating the output. The processing time on the Q was much shorter, making me think it left the original video compressed when trimming and splitting.

I tried out the possibility of editing iPhone video on the Q, and vice versa, but no go. I also was unable to copy a file back to the iPhone, or sync it to a location where I could pull it into iMovie. (iPhone guru, here’s another opportunity to berate and educate me. Thank you!) I was able to move files back and forth on the Q3HD by simply copying them to and from the SDHC card.

Perform for the Edit

One last thing I learned about editing on the camera – a simple “look at me play guitar” video doesn’t have much going on to mark edit points. So even though we don’t need a clap for audio syncing, it’s helpful to make a big obvious motion, like a large clapping motion, to mark the start of retakes. It’s also helpful to leave some generous and profound pauses before and after the playing so the edit point has enough leeway. These tricks will make it a lot easier to deal with the small screen and small controls when editing inside the camera or phone.



This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 1st, 2010 at 12:10 am and is filed under Comparisons, Video. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


5 Responses to ' Zoom Q3HD vs. iPhone 4 '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' Zoom Q3HD vs. iPhone 4 '.

  1. Bron Faison said in post # 1,

    on December 14th, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    Nice work! Clearly the audio on the Zoom Q3HD is far superior. Amazingly good quality sound to my ears. Thanks for allowing us to download the actual files, that’s very helpful and it’s good to have as well.

    The video quality (of the Q3HD) does not seem as impressive to me, though I guess it’s good enough. I hate that it uses MOV format, too, but I could live with it. But that sound, wow!

    Nice song as well. Happy Holidays!

  2. Phil said in post # 2,

    on November 4th, 2011 at 11:11 am

    Love the blog! My wife’s iPhone takes decent video of our band live, but the audio quality is so-so. Have you seen the Fostex AR-4i?

  3. Fran Guidry said in post # 3,

    on November 4th, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    Hi, Phil, thanks for visiting. No, I haven’t seen the Fostex. Ahh, an iPhone add-on – very cute. I have more video cams and audio recorders than I need (grin) so I’m not on the lookout for stuff like this.

    I did have some good luck with the iPhone capturing a friend of mine. Here’s one outdoors in Waikiki: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0NxhuSAIJY and here’s one in a hotel foyer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMFHcnBCZjI The quality may not be the greatest, but I was grateful just to be able to capture the moment.

    Fran

  4. Jake Muzzy said in post # 4,

    on November 14th, 2011 at 8:04 am

    I’m looking at the Olympus LS-20M HD Video/Audio Recorder instead of the Zoom Q3HD. It has a mic input . . . any thoughts? Appreciate your work here, thanks.

  5. Fran Guidry said in post # 5,

    on November 14th, 2011 at 8:59 am

    Hi, Jake,

    Several people have mentioned the LS-20M but I haven’t used one or read any detailed reviews. And I have more recorders and video cameras around here than I need (grin). Let us know if you get one and how you like it.

    Fran

Leave a reply






About the Blog

    Howdy, my name is Fran Guidry and this is my Homebrewed Music blog.

    I play Hawaiian slack key guitar and recorded my solo acoustic CD at home. Most of the recording information I find on the internet seems focused on bands, drums, multitracking, and so on but my main focus is recording solo acoustic guitar. Lately I’ve been enjoying video recording along with audio, so that shows up in the blog as well.

    I’m also a guitar nut. I love big ones and little ones, handmades and factory guitars, cheap ones and expensive ones. So I’ll be sharing the fun of exploring guitars as well, along with the challenges of amplifying acoustic guitars for live performance.

    Welcome!

Philosophy

    My recording philosophy is pragmatic, skeptical, not super critical. After all, the performance is by far the most important component of a track, and every aspect of any recording is a matter of taste.

    But I do like to know “about stuff.” Back in hifi days I learned about double blind testing. I learned that we humans can easily hear differences that don’t really exist. The more I’ve learned about our human auditory system, the more I’m skeptical of what people say they hear, especially if they claim that a particular microphone or preamp or cable has some magical property.

    I’ve only been recording since 2001, and when I started I found the usual places on the internet. I sought advice and accepted it, thought I would improve my recordings by using more expensive equipment. It didn’t work.

    Two things that did seem to lead to better recordings were experience and room treatment. Getting an appealing sound is the combination of many small details, and learning those details only comes from experience. Amd the sound of the recording space is obviously a big factor.

    I’ve only recorded seriously using digital technology, but I remember trying to record rehearsals and gigs back in analog days. I don’t have any nostalgia for analog recording and playback systems at all. I think even low end digital systems can capture marvelous recordings. So when I look at gear, I look for good specs: low noise, broad flat frequency response, wide dynamic range, low distortion. I’m not interested in colorful components, mics and preamps with a sound, I want the sound to be the sound of my guitar.

    But the last word is that I’m just learning and I hope you find something useful in my posts.